Pro-Choice

Non-Political Description
In favor of legal abortion services and legal access to them.

Political Description
Receiving or performing abortion services as a matter of personal choice and privacy. Supporters of the pro-choice agenda do not necessarily support abortion itself, only the position that women are entitled to make the decision themselves.

Political Benefits
Infers that those who are not “Pro-Choice” are by definition “Anti-Choice.”
Invokes the idea that personal freedom and liberty is under threat if one is not “Pro-Choice.”
Avoids referencing the word abortion which is the concept at the heart of the issue.

Reference Point
Self and others who share same political view. Unsurprisingly, this euphemism is not used by Pro-Choice opponents who instead refer to Pro-Choice advocates as Pro-Abortionists.

History
I was unable to confirm the origins of the term. What follows is the best I found.

The organization known as NARAL, National Abortion Rights Action League, was founded in 1969 by Betty Friedan and others as the National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws, and described themselves as pro-choice.

This term surfaced in sloganeering to avoid the harness of ‘pro-abortion.’ This inspired use of ‘choice’ reflected polls that showed more people identifying themselves as being ‘in favor of a woman’s right to choose’ than ‘in favor of legal abortion.’ Alan L. Otten of the ‘Wall Street Journal’ first used the term in print.” That was in a March 20, 1975 article.

Example Usage
From the Philadelphia Inquirer:

City Council yesterday rescinded its week-old proclamation that Philadelphia is a “pro-choice city,” putting an end to a purely symbolic debate that drew the attention of Cardinal Justin Rigali and roiled Council as few other issues had in months…Sponsored by Democratic Councilwoman Blondell Reynolds Brown, the resolution stated that Philadelphia supports “women’s reproductive rights and freedom” and defends “the right to choose a legal and safe abortion as a final but critical option for women.”

  • Share/Bookmark

4 Comments

4 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Mike // Jul 1, 2010 at 8:12 pm

    If you’re going to discuss ‘Pro-Choice’, then you had better also discuss ‘Pro-Life’, which is anything but. Pro-Lifers don’t give a damn about people who have exitied the womb. If they did, they would be in favor of things like universal health care, child welfare, and reasonable gun control (I own guns). Pro-Lifers want the government out of their lives, but they want the government to control the private lives of women. Pro-Life? Gimme a break. It is anti-choice, and no aggrandizing euphemism will hide that fact.

  • 2 Paul // Jul 2, 2010 at 11:45 pm

    If you’re going to comment on what I had better discuss, you ought better read what I have already written.

  • 3 Mike // Jul 4, 2010 at 1:05 pm

    When I accessed your ‘Political Euphemism Glossary’ web page on 7-1-10, the only definition on the page was for ‘Pro-Choice’. My comments were based on information provided by your website at the time I wrote them. Either your web server didn’t send me a complete page, or you’ve added definitions since I wrote my comments. If the link to your Pro-Choice definition had appeared, I would not have commented that you should also discuss ‘Pro-Life’. I apologize for that remark. As for the comments directly regarding ‘Pro-Life’, I stand by those completely.

  • 4 Mike // Jul 4, 2010 at 1:08 pm

    I forgot to add that I appreciate your glossary. Thank you for your work. I hope you keep expanding it.

Leave a Comment